TideSports    TideSports Forums    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  TideSports  Hop To Forums  Halftime    Taxes and the rich
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
All-SEC

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jiminix:
The median pay for women 25 to 48 yrs old fell from $15.04/hr in 2004 to $14.84/hr in 2007. Mortgage defaults are running 2 to 3 times the rate of last year. From 2000 to 2007, for the first time in history, the median U.S. family income fell during a time of expanding economy. By recent data, the richest 1% control 34% of the nation's wealth, while the bottom 40% control only 0.2% of the wealth.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-ru...l23,0,3336770.column

Another one today, even more to the point, actually:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/23/news/economy/middle_class/index.htm

Periodically, stories like this last one turn up in the newspapers. Each year, they're worse than the year before. Are the rich getting smarter and more hard working, while working people are getting lazier and dumber? Or is there some other, more sinister explanation?

I think it's obvious that the answer to the first question is NO, and the answer to the second is YES.

Our economic system in this country has evolved in a way that is substantially biased toward the economic aristocracy. Those with political and corporate power, who by and large are identical with the wealthy, have convinced most of the working people that their decline is due to taxation, and the cure is lower taxes. The reality is that with every tax cut, workers' share of the economic pie dwindles, because the tax cuts always are skewed to the benefit of the wealthy. Minimum wage workers now earn about half what minimum wage workers earned 50 yrs ago (in buying power adjusted for inflation).

Even though we give the same name "conservative" to those who favor authoritarian conformative social structures and those who favor deregulation of corporate interests, they actually have very little in common. And the corporatists always take the money and run, and leave only crumbs for the social conservatives. They do this by dividing worker against worker. The increasing benefits of society will never go to the people, until they understand that they have common interests, and that the people's interests are opposed to those of the economic aristocracy.

Workers and small businessmen, whether liberal or conservative, will continue to fall farther behind, until they realize that they are not the major opponents of each other - they share their most dangerous opponent, the corporate masters.

Oh my my, did you miss something that you THOUGHT you were entitled to? Miss your check, maybe miss the boat altogether jimma boy. Well, time to get off your ass and make your own way there sonny, times a wastin'. The rich don't owe you jack! They've got thiers and you got to find yours!


I always thought the knuckleball was the easiest pitch to catch. Wait'll it stops rolling, then go to the backstop and pick it up." ― broadcaster and former catcher Bob Uecker
 
Posts: 4771 | Location: Orange Tx. . | Registered: July 22, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Five-star prospect
Picture of jiminix

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Know:
top management and wealthy investors who re-invest thier money and create more jobs which makes more money which creates more .....get the picture.

Or maybe they just buy a $100 million dollar estate. Or a dozen $500,000 cars. Or a $10,000,000 race horse. Or a $30,000,000 painting which they figure they can sell for $50,000,000 after the next tax cut. Or maybe they just get a $50,000,000 severance package for doing a bad job and getting fired.
 
Posts: 129 | Registered: June 19, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
All-SEC

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jiminix:
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Know:
top management and wealthy investors who re-invest thier money and create more jobs which makes more money which creates more .....get the picture.

Or maybe they just buy a $100 million dollar estate. Or a dozen $500,000 cars. Or a $10,000,000 race horse. Or a $30,000,000 painting which they figure they can sell for $50,000,000 after the next tax cut. Or maybe they just get a $50,000,000 severance package for doing a bad job and getting fired.

someone will build that estate, make that car, breed that horse, make that painting. The severance thing is up to his previous employer. what's it to you? Do the words "driving the economy" mean anything to you?


I always thought the knuckleball was the easiest pitch to catch. Wait'll it stops rolling, then go to the backstop and pick it up." ― broadcaster and former catcher Bob Uecker
 
Posts: 4771 | Location: Orange Tx. . | Registered: July 22, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Heisman hopeful
Picture of Groove Thing

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rankincooter01:

1. But what you're not recognizing is that the rich are paying a disporportionate amount in taxes as it relates to their income. The top 1% made about 20% of the money. But they paid about 40% of the taxes. That lies my problem.


Can you tell me where you're getting this data from? Are you saying that the top 1% of wage earners only earn 20% of the total money earned in the US economy? I'm not sure that's accurate.

quote:


2. Your logic is a little flawed. It's not that the tax cuts mean they get "more dollars back," it means they don't get as much taken from them. There's a difference. The worker earns the money, the gov't just takes its cut. In this case, a lower one.


No, the logic isn't flawed but perhaps the language isn't as clear as it could be.

quote:


It's class warfare on the rich's part because it's their money that is being redistributed to those who are less accomplished.


This is only true if you only consider the things that go into programs that help poor people, like foodstamps, etc. There are other things that the taxes that everyone pays, including rich people, that benefit society as a whole, rich people included. In some ways, because rich people have more at stake in this economy and in this society, they receive a larger benefit than poor people in this area, even if you include the programs that amount to payments by the gov't to poor people. Failure to consider these other things that are paid for with tax money that also benefit rich people constitutes class warfare, in my opinion.

quote:

3. "Ruinous debt" you say? We don't have debt because of tax cuts.


We have debt precisely because of tax cuts. The people who pushed the cuts didn't also push corresponding spending cuts and hence the deficits exploded. They pursued their own interests (political and financial) at the expense of the health of the country in general.
 
Posts: 2656 | Registered: October 25, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Five-star prospect
Picture of rankincooter01

Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Groove Thing:
Are you saying that the top 1% of wage earners only earn 20% of the total money earned in the US economy? I'm not sure that's accurate.


--I don't have time to find it posted on the IRS site, but I've got a WSJ article that cites the IRS stats, if you'd accept such an article. Click HERE


quote:

No, the logic isn't flawed but perhaps the language isn't as clear as it could be.


--How can a tax cut be giving money "back" when it's the gov't not taking as much to begin with? You can't give back what you don't have. That's why your logic on this is flawed. Unless you're arguing that it's actually the government's money rather than the individual who worked for it. Is that your stance?

quote:

This is only true if you only consider the things that go into programs that help poor people, like foodstamps, etc...There are other things that the taxes that everyone pays... benefit society as a whole


--Food stamps, defense, you name it. But when the poor actually have a NEGATIVE income tax rate, then they're getting free foodstamps, free military protection, free everything really. That's where the class warfare is a factor. Look at the Obama promises. How does he plan to pay for it? One way is to tax the rich. It's how politicians pit the minority (rich) against the majority of us who aren't. We need to change the tax code.

quote:

We have debt precisely because of tax cuts. The people who pushed the cuts didn't also push corresponding spending cuts and hence the deficits exploded.


--You claim we have debt precisely because of tax cuts in one sentence, but in the next we have debt because of a failure to cut spending? How do people get in debt? They spend more than they have. We have a budget deficit & a $9 trillion debt because politicians keep borrowing money they don't have.

And if you're arguing that the tax cuts actually decreased revenues to the federal gov't, I'm going to guess without researching that you're wrong. You can prove me wrong if you want.


Remember Pat Tillman
 
Posts: 199 | Location: Atlanta | Registered: December 24, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior
Picture of BamaBraveFan

Posted Hide Post
It's something like being a devil worshipper or a pedophile, isn't it? Or maybe freemasonry?



It's insane and ignorant comments like this that make me quite proud to be a freemason.

Freemasonry compared to a pedophile, now I've read everything.
 
Posts: 1551 | Location: Mobile, AL | Registered: April 12, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic Powered by Eve For Enterprise Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 

TideSports    TideSports Forums    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  TideSports  Hop To Forums  Halftime    Taxes and the rich