quote:

Originally posted by double nickel:
You really are a barn fan, "aint", nice education.

quote:

Originally posted by plane man:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:

quote:

Originally posted by superman:

quote:

Originally posted by cb20476:
i mean, really. you told on someone? you went and told on someone? for liking your teams rival?

I told the Tuscaloosa Police Department police Chief, who is head over police officers that work around the entire City, particularly the University of Alabama, that one of his men had an Auburn tag on the front of his vehicle (which was clearly against the idea of "uniformity", which all PDs use). Also, with the growing buzz of a TPD "Conspriacy", and their credibility dwindling every day, I brought it to his attention. When a PUBLIC OFFICIAL who is supposed to have NO bias is driving around town and CAMPUS with an Auburn tag on his car, and then one of his co-workers falsifies a police report in order to arrest a Bama player, there is a PROBLEM that needs to be fixed. This part of the PROBLEM has been fixed, thanks to Mr. Swindle. Bite me.

Ok is this a room full of teenagers? Are you all serious? You honestly think TPD is arresting people based on their football loyalties? And I thought JFK was a streach. So you have succeded in removing all tags from TPD cars. So now everything should be right with the world. I guess no one posting in here has a tag on their vehicle or work vehicle. Would that mean the service or goods you provide would be of less quality. The problem is, if everyone knew how to act when out in public and everyone did not have to have an excuss for their actions, the police would not have to put such a large amount of officers on the strip. All of those officers are working overtime to keep things safe. What are you doing with your off time to help the city and its citizens? I wonder if they would rather be with their families? My thoughts are for all the ignorant posters in here to come up with something real to talk about.

And as far as writting false information in reports. You need to show prof before you make a statement of slander. I am not talking about some one told me or I knew a guy or I heard. Bring us real prof. I am willing to bet you have nothing to show any part of this officers report was made up.

Maybe not false, but not smarter than a fifth grader either. Officer Kilgore claimed to have smelled the odor of alcohol. If he wasn't asleep in the police academy, he would have learned that alcohol has no odor.
Officers are trained to testify that they detected the odor of an alcoholic beverage. If they can identify the beverage odor as beer, whiskey, gin etc. they should do so.
False, maybe. Stupid rookie mistake, maybe. Auburn criminal justice major, for sure.

quote:

Originally posted by easton3:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:


No what it clearly is.....people in here think law and order is wonderful as long as it doesnt effect them or their football teams chances of winning. Same people that complain about officers speeding one day and the next complain about it taking to long to get there to help them.

Hey, my name is wazzup and I am a liberal 20 something that don't know squat.


ROLL TIDE !!!!

quote:

Originally posted by hhoward2:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:

quote:

Originally posted by superman:

quote:

Originally posted by cb20476:
i mean, really. you told on someone? you went and told on someone? for liking your teams rival?

I told the Tuscaloosa Police Department police Chief, who is head over police officers that work around the entire City, particularly the University of Alabama, that one of his men had an Auburn tag on the front of his vehicle (which was clearly against the idea of "uniformity", which all PDs use). Also, with the growing buzz of a TPD "Conspriacy", and their credibility dwindling every day, I brought it to his attention. When a PUBLIC OFFICIAL who is supposed to have NO bias is driving around town and CAMPUS with an Auburn tag on his car, and then one of his co-workers falsifies a police report in order to arrest a Bama player, there is a PROBLEM that needs to be fixed. This part of the PROBLEM has been fixed, thanks to Mr. Swindle. Bite me.

Ok is this a room full of teenagers? Are you all serious? You honestly think TPD is arresting people based on their football loyalties? And I thought JFK was a streach. So you have succeded in removing all tags from TPD cars. So now everything should be right with the world. I guess no one posting in here has a tag on their vehicle or work vehicle. Would that mean the service or goods you provide would be of less quality. The problem is, if everyone knew how to act when out in public and everyone did not have to have an excuss for their actions, the police would not have to put such a large amount of officers on the strip. All of those officers are working overtime to keep things safe. What are you doing with your off time to help the city and its citizens? I wonder if they would rather be with their families? My thoughts are for all the ignorant posters in here to come up with something real to talk about.

To think that the police are a great group out for the common good is the more ignorant thought. There's a reason that such a huge number of people no longer trust them for anything. To protect and serve......What a joke! I would love for ALL of them, everywhere, to spend more time with their family! Let's save some tax dollars by cutting the forces down to cover the major issues other than hiding to try to lure someone into another ticket to raise money for a city, and yes, college, town cops are terrible! They are always looking for a way to punish a college student financially.
Why don't you let one of them put you in a choke-hold, and then you see if you are wanting to fight back with all of your might! It's human nature to do whatever one must do to protect themselves from everyone, including the country's "finest"! If you don't believe this happened, then listen to the interviews of all those that were witnesses to this event? It's all over the net from various sources that prove things were not handled professionally. There's a reason that Coach Saban went to visit the TPD, and there's a reason the charges are suddenly being "reduced".

quote:

Originally posted by capstone33:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:
And as far as writting false information in reports. You need to show prof before you make a statement of slander. I am not talking about some one told me or I knew a guy or I heard. Bring us real prof. I am willing to bet you have nothing to show any part of this officers report was made up.

There you go again. Not having a clue what you are talking about. It became public knowledge last Friday that Kilgore falsified Johnson's police report.

quote:

Originally posted by Marshal Dillon:

quote:

Originally posted by capstone33:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:
And as far as writting false information in reports. You need to show prof before you make a statement of slander. I am not talking about some one told me or I knew a guy or I heard. Bring us real prof. I am willing to bet you have nothing to show any part of this officers report was made up.

There you go again. Not having a clue what you are talking about. It became public knowledge last Friday that Kilgore falsified Johnson's police report.

Cap. I'm a little confused. All I have heard is the defense lawyer for Johnson said the video was different. Has something else come out or did I miss something?

quote:

Originally posted by Great Saban:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:
And as far as writting false information in reports. You need to show prof before you make a statement of slander. I am not talking about some one told me or I knew a guy or I heard. Bring us real prof. I am willing to bet you have nothing to show any part of this officers report was made up.

1. Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Slander does not apply to written statements. In this case, he typed his opinion, therefore it exists as a "fixed" representation. So get your own facts straight before you go spouting off pretending to be a lawyer.

2. If the person makes a statement of opinion as opposed to fact, the statement may not support a cause of action for defamation. Whether a statement is viewed as an expression of fact or opinion can depend upon context - that is, whether or not the person making the statement would be perceived by the community as being in a position to know whether or not it is true.

3. A defense similar to opinion is "fair comment on a matter of public interest". For example, if the mayor of a town is involved in a corruption scandal, expressing the opinion that you believe the allegations are true is not likely to support a cause of action for defamation.

4. Under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, New York Times v Sullivan, where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice". In translation, that means that the person making the statement knew the statement to be false, or issued the statement with reckless disregard as to its truth.

5. Obviously the report wasn't made up. It's real and exists as a matter of public record now. The facts in the report, however, appear to be grossly misrepresented.

6. You're an idiot.

quote:

Bring us real prof.

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:
Then reveal to us what was fasle and how we know this?

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:

quote:

Originally posted by easton3:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:


No what it clearly is.....people in here think law and order is wonderful as long as it doesnt effect them or their football teams chances of winning. Same people that complain about officers speeding one day and the next complain about it taking to long to get there to help them.

Hey, my name is wazzup and I am a liberal 20 something that don't know squat.


ROLL TIDE !!!!

Conservitises are for law and order. Guess you would be a democrate

quote:

Originally posted by superman:

quote:

Originally posted by cb20476:
yeah, that should calm the auburn police fan down alot. he's probably happy that an alabama fan has told on him for having an auburn tag. he will NEVER target an alabama player again. go ahead and blame yourself for the next five arrests, idiot.

This is really interesting. I thought the picture was doctored with photoshop and the tag was added that way. Amazing that they would have a car with that on it in T-town. If the moron cop wants it on his personal car, fine. But none of that should be on a taxpayer funded car, whether it be Alabama or Auburn.

quote:

Originally posted by jalamb:

quote:

Originally posted by Great Saban:

quote:

Originally posted by wazzup:
And as far as writting false information in reports. You need to show prof before you make a statement of slander. I am not talking about some one told me or I knew a guy or I heard. Bring us real prof. I am willing to bet you have nothing to show any part of this officers report was made up.

1. Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Slander does not apply to written statements. In this case, he typed his opinion, therefore it exists as a "fixed" representation. So get your own facts straight before you go spouting off pretending to be a lawyer.

2. If the person makes a statement of opinion as opposed to fact, the statement may not support a cause of action for defamation. Whether a statement is viewed as an expression of fact or opinion can depend upon context - that is, whether or not the person making the statement would be perceived by the community as being in a position to know whether or not it is true.

3. A defense similar to opinion is "fair comment on a matter of public interest". For example, if the mayor of a town is involved in a corruption scandal, expressing the opinion that you believe the allegations are true is not likely to support a cause of action for defamation.

4. Under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as set forth by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1964 Case, New York Times v Sullivan, where a public figure attempts to bring an action for defamation, the public figure must prove an additional element: That the statement was made with "actual malice". In translation, that means that the person making the statement knew the statement to be false, or issued the statement with reckless disregard as to its truth.

5. Obviously the report wasn't made up. It's real and exists as a matter of public record now. The facts in the report, however, appear to be grossly misrepresented.

6. You're an idiot.